Hey Media, who’s your owner?

0008

Start of a new month calls for another blog post obviously. The hot topic of today is about Government VS Private media ownership – whether it matters in the Singapore context. The relationship between the media and the audience was clearly established in my previous posts. Now, it’s important to understand the relationship between the Media and its owner.

Private Media

Individuals or people from a private organization are ones in charge of private media. This means they finance it themselves without government interferences. So, those people get to rule the media and show the information they want to show you be. The United States of America is one such example where 6 major companies own 90% of America’s media. This kind of media usually has a liberal sense of point as they can say what they want, be it, supporting or opposing the government.

media-infographic.jpg

Due to this, diversity of content information is observed due to differing viewpoints between private media. Sometimes it’s a positive outlook as it provides thinking in a new limelight, Like the US media coverage for Vietnam War showing the negative aspects of the war (innocent people being killed) while the US government was promoting that the war was beneficial.

However, too much freedom is not a good thing as well since it can go haywire anytime. Going against the boundaries of state-related or religious related information can create disputes, riots and even death. Even then, the freedom of speech is being used in movies and documentaries to show people what the world is really like and possibly make a change in them. For example, 13 Reasons Why, an American programme by Netflix, showed us the brutal truth of suicide, depression, sexual assault, homosexuality and what not. However, it received a lot of controversies as it was too hard on the eye and cases of suicide following the style of the programme.

Then again, as I mentioned, this media is outsourced by the private group and thus they must find a way to earn more money and thus the use of entertainment. Shows like Big Brother, Keeping up with the Kardashians and other programmes get us hooked to them unknowingly. We are provided with so many reality shows and programmes for entertainment and relaxation purposes nowadays, it almost seems like we are distancing ourselves away from the reality?

535078-13-reasons-why-la-mort-de-hannah-est-d-950x0-1.gif         giphy.gif

Government-owned Media

The name is self-explanatory and so the media tend to support the government and its views. This will make the country trust their government more and less of the private media due to its reliability, people tend to think that information through this type of mainstream media is credible. But the government are smart in letting you know, what you want you to know and not what you are supposed to know.

China is known for its notorious censorship laws using firewalls to restrict media, banning websites like Google, Facebook, YouTube and even Wikipedia and arresting those who break the censorship laws. This is because the media was used to propose propaganda from the government and thus China had to protect its political sentiment what better way to protect? 

Censorship-in-China

Hence, the freedom of expression in China is very low and rather have a concentrated way of thinking as they are not exposed to other viewpoints. Even in movies, China screens limited foreign films as most are banned for reasons such as homosexuality, opposing China’s policy, race and religion. Some notable films that were banned are Deadpool, The Dark Knight, Avatar, Love, Simon and so on.

orig.gif  tenor.gif

Hey! Not all government-controlled media are as such. Our Singapore is one such example. Even though our major media corporations, MediaCorp Pte Ltd and Singapore Press Holdings are legally known as privately owned entities, they are still linked to the Singapore government and thus tend to take a pro-government stance. Yet, we can express our opinions and thoughts with the limitations of sensitive to political, racial and religious views. Websites like Stomp, Mothership.sg and SGAG let us voice out what we feel and even makes a parody of certain viewpoints.

Singapore is also known for its stringent censorship laws but not too extreme like China. Ah Boys To Men movie series was directed to educate us about the pre, during and post life of National Service, the problems faced, how they were tackled and in the end how NS shaped the boys into men. Films like Love Simon, that contains homosexuality was rated R21 in Singapore as the topic is still a touchy subject to us and thus rated as such. On the bright side, at least it was not banned. 

However, when anything that seems to impact on the social stability of Singapore is observed, censorship is enforced to maintain the peace and stability. Like the infamous Amos Yee, who wanted to express his opinions but did so by hurting the sentiment of Singapore such as disrespecting Mr Lee Kwan Yew’s passing, Islamic beliefs and openly talking about Pedophilia. Thus, he was arrested multiple times and now has fled the country.

Related image

So do I feel if media ownership matters in Singapore?

Related image

In Singapore, we are given the freedom of expression and speech and if we do not cross the limits, it will be fine. No matter who owns the media, in the end, the last say has to be from the government. We still have a diversity of content, objectivity in our content and can think proactively in a different limelight without blindly believing everything we see or hear, we are pretty much safe in peace and harmony. And honestly, we are happy as long as we get the information we want to know which so far, we are provided with.

Remember to think carefully when it comes to media. Adiosss!

Related image

4 thoughts on “Hey Media, who’s your owner?

  1. Hi Nabilah 😊 I liked the brief introduction given for private and government media, it was simplified which makes it easy to understand. Great research done for America, you have evidences to back your say which makes your comparison more credible. Agree to how programmes portraying real life issues such as ‘13 reason why’ wasn’t really accepted by the viewers and it gained a lot of criticism.

    The examples given for government owned media showed extreme censorship and mild censorship, great comparison made to show not all censored media are restricted entirely. Liked the example of Amos Yee, it showed how the freedom of speech could lead to him getting into trouble as he threatened national security by speaking about the government and religion. Agree to your conclusion on how it doesn’t matter who owns the media as viewers concern should be on whether they’re able to get information to add to their knowledge and not on how the information is sourced.😊

    Liked by 1 person

  2. Hello Nabilah! After reading through your post, it provides me more detailed information about the private media and government owned media from other countries. I agree with the point that you have mentioned in the United States even though they may have the advantages of having private media but there will always a disagreement and bias in between causing riots and other negativity thoughts. The graphics and examples given were interesting and able to related to other events about the incident that are happening in other countries that you have mentioned in United States and in China.

    Agreeing on another point that not all countries that the media owned by government will be strict and filled with rules that are for forbidden to downloaded that application and surf in to the websites but in Singapore, I we are much more fortunate to be able to voice out on Stomp and SGAG unlike in China , most of their freedom on entertainment are restricted from surfing and downloading. The very least are the media provided for us are safe and secured to use. Looking forward to your next post!

    Liked by 1 person

  3. Hey Nabz! Such an organized an informative post! You gave a good description about what is the good and bad behind each type of media and the different examples helped me understand your point better.

    Yes, sometimes STOMP is indeed insensitive to certain issues such as race even though they have the freedom to say whatever they choose to. Amos Yee was also another great example of freedom of speech but was he was also insensitive to the government and certain religion which got him in the bad light.

    I agree that we can live in peace and harmony if we do not blindly follow the media because not everything is true in the media world nowadays, right? Anyway, great post and looking forward for more!

    Liked by 1 person

  4. Hi Nabilah,

    You gave great explanations and examples given for both Private and Government media ownership. After reading your blog post, it feels like your argument has made me a believer. I think in this point of time, I agree with you based on your post that media ownership may not matter for Singapore. Yes, because of the laws and regulations that publishers have to go through. But, would it be safe to say that, if private has a bigger slice of the media ownership cake. Things can lead to be like Australia and Rupert Murdoch? Where private media has more influence in the society than the government? Hence, media ownership in Singapore then will be of a debatable matter?

    After all, it is just my 2-cents worth. Thank you for going the extra mile with detailed statistics of America’s media, controversies about ’13 Reasons why’, censorship in china and the current regulations in Singapore.

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a comment